First Sale Victory: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley

In United States copyright law, the first sale doctrine is what permits libraries to lend books and other materials. 17 USC § 109(a). Kirtsaeng v. Wiley is a case challenging the applicability of the first use doctrine to copyrighted material manufactured abroad. Since thousands of books are manufactured overseas, the case raised the possibility of libraries needing to get permission from copyright holders to lend books. The case also threatened used bookstores, and any other retailer that sells used goods.  These lenders and sellers all rely on the first use doctrine.

Section 109(a) of copyright law describes the first sale doctrine, which applies to any work “lawfully made under this title.” The question was whether that phrase has a geographic meaning. Wiley argued that since “this title” refers to a United States statute, the first sale doctrine only applies to items purchased in the United States. Kirtsaeng argued that the phrase means the work was “lawfully” made – not pirated or illegal.

On March 19 the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. Wiley case. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled in favor of Kirtsaeng. Writing for the majority, Justice Breyer stated:

Putting section numbers to the side, we ask whether the “first sale” doctrine applies to protect a buyer or other lawful owner of a copy (of a copyrighted work) lawfully manufactured abroad. Can that buyer bring that copy into the United States (and sell it or give it away) without obtaining permission to do so from the copyright owner? Can, for example, someone who purchases, say at a used bookstore, a book printed abroad subsequently resell it without the copyright owner’s permission?

In our view, the answers to these questions are, yes.

There is significant coverage of this decision. Below is a sampling.

Library perspectives:

Publisher perspectives:

For more on copyright, try these library books:

Crews, Kenneth D. Copyright Law for Librarians and Educators: Creative Strategies and Practical Solutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: American Library Association, 2012.

Nimmer, David. Copyright Illuminated: Refocusing the Diffuse US Statute. Austin : Alphen Aan Den Rijn, Netherlands : Frederick, MD: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2008.

Bently, Lionel, Uma Suthersanen, and Paul Torremans. Global Copyright: Three Hundred Years Since the Statute of Anne, From 1709 to Cyberspace. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2010

Share
This entry was posted in For Faculty, For Graduate Students, For Students and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

One Response to First Sale Victory: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley

  1. Here’s the thing for three years I have suffered in silence with my 8 to 5 job. Putting up with the pressures from management, just recently at my employment we had beer being provided , when my vice president asked me for bottle opener, my reply was ” I don’t drink”, his comment back was it wasn’t about me but what I could do for him. At that point I let it go, but then last night we had a work party at a place to celebrate our victory in uprising sales. Unfornately I had to head back to my residence where I am resident manager to find out that my apartment was on fire. I told my boss before I left the party to inform of what was going on, as i made a beeline for the door. I also informed him by leaving a message on cell phone. This morning I called to give him updated report only for him to say he was disappointed in me and that i better report to work tommorrow. I found another job and now I’m giving notice how do I express my feelings in the two notice, any advice is helpful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>